Mark Johnson poses the question “what's right for 2005?” in terms of year-end reports (games played, 5/10 reports, etc.). I don't know either, but I can say this: my inbox is filled (well, not exactly as I used gmail to auto-archive and label them) with 117 unread spielfrieks messages that are mostly end of year reports that I probably won't ever read. I also decided not to track my games played this year - that quantitative summary isn't very useful to me. I prefer to rely on a subjective retrospective.
I am a fan of the aggregated 5/10 summary reports that should be coming out soon so that I can see broad trends (other than the fact that, surprise surprise, a lot of people were playing Ticket to Ride last year). The problem, however, with the aggregated report is that you lose some of the value of the individual reports where you might find tidbits of surprise.
Looking back on 2004, what games do I subjectively recall playing a lot? Here goes:
Beyond this list there are probably 50 or more games that I played once or twice. There's good and bad in this approach, but mostly I love learning new stuff and surveying the landscape. If it happens again next year that will be fine, though I'd like to explore a few games with depth and play them 5-10 times.
My unplayed but owned list isn't all that big any more. I hope to play all of these in 2005:
Page rendered at Sunday, July 20, 2008 4:16:04 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.