Quantcast
 Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Time to catch up on some recent gaming!

Through the Ages

Two weekends ago Jacob and I tried to take on the full game of Through the Ages.  Jacob has been itching to play this again and I was happy to accommodate - this was clearly one of the top games I played in 2006.

The last time we played we tried the advanced game and we were excited to experience the full experience - mostly because we wanted to get Bill Gates as a leader.

Through the Ages

I did a much better job this time around managing my military.  I wanted to make sure I didn't fall too far behind him and get sent into a downward spiral as we started to reveal events.  This strategy worked out well, especially coupled with Michelangelo - I had a stable military with some accelerated culture production that allowed me to race away with the lead.

Four hours into the game, we were easily 2 hours from being done.  I was so far ahead that we both agreed to stop the game.  The game felt longer this time around, and I'm not sure why.  Downtime wasn't bad at all, so maybe it was just unfamiliarity with the rules at the start.  Still, I'm not sure I'm prepared to invest 5-6 hours for the full game.

ASK Start Kit #1

Time to revisit my nemesis ASL, via the second scenario of the Starter Kit #1 that introduces machine guns.  If you recall, we made good progress last time we played this but I still expressed some frustration with the rules and jargon. I truly thought we'd be well poised to move on to the next set of rules, but in reality we were right back where we started.  As I read the rules, I keep wanting to create my own abstractions to simplify things - I just don't care about the level of realism that the core system offers.  The terseness of the rules is such a hindrance, and the index is nearly worthless.  Case in point: we were trying to figure out ROF (rate-of-fire) for LMGs (light machine guns) etc.  I understand the concept, but I could not for the life of me figure out how you determine if the gun gets another fire.  Look up ROF in the index and you get pointed to MG section, but there's no clue there as to how ROF is triggered.  Turns out this is explained in brief early on in the rules, and it took 5-10 minutes of reading and re-reading to figure this out.

ASL

Imagine how frustrating it is for Jacob to sit there wait while I dig through the rules trying to figure out this (very important) rule.  This is where being terse is a huge hindrance for the rules - MMP should double the size of the rulebook and include redundant information as appropriate via callouts and other explanatory text.  I'm sure the SK is big improvement over starting with the ASL rulebook, but I think there's room for improvement.  After receiving Combat Commander: Europe last week I'm forecasting that ASL will never get played again in my household in favor for this lighter, more dynamic squad level game.  More on that later.

Big Kini

I've played Big Kini 3 times in the past few weeks and I continue to be impressed with this mostly undiscovered game.  Doug did a nice writeup of my last session playing this and brought up a good point about the human factors, but I wouldn't get too concerned about his issues.  I think after a play or two the eye candy on the board gets to be pretty decipherable.

Web of Power

I finally got a chance to play Web of Power while over at Mike's a couple of weeks ago.  Wow, what a fun but tough game to figure out (strategy-wise).  I've been reading about Web of Power (and the related game China) for some time but never pulled the trigger on a purchase, primarily because I'd like to try before I buy.  George had played before but needed some time to refresh on the rules, but once we started the game was over within 45 minutes.  Matt did an impressive job taking advantage of connections between provinces (I didn't even notice the connections over sea lanes!) and easily beat us.  A fun time and I'd like to try China now to see if that would be a good purchase option.

posted on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:01:51 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [3]
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:18:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Chris: With regards to Through the Ages, keep playing it. Our first three-player Full game (after several Advanced games) only took us about 4 and a quarter hours. I'm sure it will go faster as you get a little more familiar with the game. We also found it helpful to combine the endgame tasks--one player adjusts the new totals on the board, a second removes and slides down cards on the display, while a third deals out the new ones. Even with two players, I'm sure you can save some time by doing this briskly. Alternatively, you can follow the designer's hint to have one player start their turn while the other finishes up his bookkeeping. But I'm certain you'll be able to get in two-player Full games in 4 hours. And this game is *definitely* worth that much time. I hope you continue to enjoy it--it's my favorite game from last year.

By the way, congratulations to Jacob on his Colts getting into the Big Game (I assume he's a fan from his cap)!
Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:09:45 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Thanks for the encouraging words Larry. We won't give up and we'll see if we can streamline. We *did* do overlapping turns so clearly we still have some work to do to speed things up.

We are ALL big Colts fans and can't wait for Superbowl. In fact, Matthew and I re-watched the final 3 minutes of the game tonight on Tivo.
Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:32:45 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Regarding Web of Power vs. China..... I loved Web of Power, traded it away when I heard about China. I just traded away China and dearly wish I still had my copy of Web of Power. Why oh why do publishers insist on making changes when they republish a successful game (actually you might be able to answer this with Incan Gold). In this case, I think Uberplay failed miserably. One of the great things about Web of Power was how the game revolved around Frankreich...there was point in each game where you had to consciously decide whether you would fight for alliances around FR, or not. It could be very lucrative, or you could fail miserably. That tension is completely absent from China. All the areas in China are basically interchangeable, which takes away much of the "story." Also I find the color/graphics to be an enormous step down. Obviously this is all IMO and all that...

Mike

Comments are closed.