Quantcast
 Saturday, January 27, 2007

I  hosted our Tuesday night gaming session this week and got to break out a couple of Essen releases that haven't seen much action since my return.

Mike spied Die Baumeister von Arkadia on my shelf and we agreed it would a good choice for the 3 or 4 players we were expecting.  I'd been staring at this game on my shelf for sometime wondering why I hadn't played it since returning from Essen - it was one of my favorites there.

Arkadia

The game taught and played very quickly.  The one strategy I remembered to convey is to not wait too long to use your flags to cash in seals and get new workers - the game can end very suddenly and it is hard to win if you've not managed to get your works out generating seals for you.  Peter got the knack of the game very quickly and won by a decent margin.  We played the game in about an hour - great game value for time invested.

Arkadia Closeup

Next we played a press-your-luck chicken game that Peter made.  It has some interesting mechanics to it but something wasn't quite right.  We may have played a rule or two incorrectly.  I'd be willing to try it again after some review.

Peter had to go so Mike, George, and I elected to play the much derided Alhambra Dice Game.  Make sure you try this game before you write it off - it isn't nearly as bad as many are saying, and there are some interesting choices to make at times.  Still, the luck of the dice rules and the best laid plans can be for naught if the dice don't agree with you.

Alhambra Dice Game

My one complaint with the game is that it is too long.  It took 90 minutes to play a full game, and it doesn't hold up well alongside Arkadia.  Perhaps a game with four rounds, scoring after the 2nd and 4th, would be better.

posted on Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:22:24 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [1]
 Wednesday, January 24, 2007

I've managed to have my voice show up in a couple of interesting places lately.  First, my friends over at Distinction Communication had me record a radio spot for them promoting an upcoming public seminar.  We've sent about 30 people through this training at Corillian - these guys are top-notch and if you need to up the ante for business public speaking you should check these guys out.  This spot has been running for the past 2 weeks on 1190 KEX here in Portland.

Second, I was interviewed by good friend and co-worker Scott Hanselman for his Hanselminutes podcast Board Gaming for Programmers.  In this podcast Scott, Eli Smith, and I introduce Scott's geek programmer audience to another world of geekiness - modern boardgames.  Scott tells me he's focused on the WAF (wife acceptance factor) and introducing his wife Mo to 10 Days in Africa and hopes to try Jambo and Settlers soon.  I think that's a good order - Jambo is a great two-player game (though not trivial to learn) but don't wait too long to try out Settlers!

posted on Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:41:01 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [1]
 Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Jacob and I spent Saturday and Sunday up at Nanitch Lodge with our Boy Scout troop.  This is the sixth straight year I've been to a scout outing up on the mountain, but my first time spending the night in the lodge.  We shared the lodge with three other local troops and had a blast.  The weather was perfect (highs in the low 30s), we got a nice blanket of snow on Saturday, and the snow tubing was exciting as always (and no injuries!).  Here's a great shot of Jacob getting some air.

Jacob Tubing

Last night Julie and I walked over to Matthew's school to see his big 4th grade play on the history of Oregon (My Oregon Report by Ralph Nelson).  Matthew played Thomas Jefferson - the guy who swindled Napoleon out of the Louisiana Purchase and set Lewis and Clark off on their way to Oregon.  Matthew did a great job acting and singing and we are very proud of him.

Matthew as Jefferson

posted on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:17:25 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0]

GameStorm link

GameStorm 9, March 30 - April 1 at the Portland Airport Sheraton, will be featuring Reiner Knizia as its guest of honor this year.  There are several reasons why I'm excited to attend this year:

  • Dr. Knizia will be there
  • I will be running the Kniziathon
  • This location should be substantially better than the Red Lion last year.  Our hotel room situation was a disaster last year, and I've already managed to book a nice room with 2 queen beds.
  • The timing is nice, coming right on the end of spring break for the kids.  This will make it easy for Jacob and I to get there early on Friday and miss the often terrible cross-town traffic.
posted on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:07:51 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0]

Time to catch up on some recent gaming!

Through the Ages

Two weekends ago Jacob and I tried to take on the full game of Through the Ages.  Jacob has been itching to play this again and I was happy to accommodate - this was clearly one of the top games I played in 2006.

The last time we played we tried the advanced game and we were excited to experience the full experience - mostly because we wanted to get Bill Gates as a leader.

Through the Ages

I did a much better job this time around managing my military.  I wanted to make sure I didn't fall too far behind him and get sent into a downward spiral as we started to reveal events.  This strategy worked out well, especially coupled with Michelangelo - I had a stable military with some accelerated culture production that allowed me to race away with the lead.

Four hours into the game, we were easily 2 hours from being done.  I was so far ahead that we both agreed to stop the game.  The game felt longer this time around, and I'm not sure why.  Downtime wasn't bad at all, so maybe it was just unfamiliarity with the rules at the start.  Still, I'm not sure I'm prepared to invest 5-6 hours for the full game.

ASK Start Kit #1

Time to revisit my nemesis ASL, via the second scenario of the Starter Kit #1 that introduces machine guns.  If you recall, we made good progress last time we played this but I still expressed some frustration with the rules and jargon. I truly thought we'd be well poised to move on to the next set of rules, but in reality we were right back where we started.  As I read the rules, I keep wanting to create my own abstractions to simplify things - I just don't care about the level of realism that the core system offers.  The terseness of the rules is such a hindrance, and the index is nearly worthless.  Case in point: we were trying to figure out ROF (rate-of-fire) for LMGs (light machine guns) etc.  I understand the concept, but I could not for the life of me figure out how you determine if the gun gets another fire.  Look up ROF in the index and you get pointed to MG section, but there's no clue there as to how ROF is triggered.  Turns out this is explained in brief early on in the rules, and it took 5-10 minutes of reading and re-reading to figure this out.

ASL

Imagine how frustrating it is for Jacob to sit there wait while I dig through the rules trying to figure out this (very important) rule.  This is where being terse is a huge hindrance for the rules - MMP should double the size of the rulebook and include redundant information as appropriate via callouts and other explanatory text.  I'm sure the SK is big improvement over starting with the ASL rulebook, but I think there's room for improvement.  After receiving Combat Commander: Europe last week I'm forecasting that ASL will never get played again in my household in favor for this lighter, more dynamic squad level game.  More on that later.

Big Kini

I've played Big Kini 3 times in the past few weeks and I continue to be impressed with this mostly undiscovered game.  Doug did a nice writeup of my last session playing this and brought up a good point about the human factors, but I wouldn't get too concerned about his issues.  I think after a play or two the eye candy on the board gets to be pretty decipherable.

Web of Power

I finally got a chance to play Web of Power while over at Mike's a couple of weeks ago.  Wow, what a fun but tough game to figure out (strategy-wise).  I've been reading about Web of Power (and the related game China) for some time but never pulled the trigger on a purchase, primarily because I'd like to try before I buy.  George had played before but needed some time to refresh on the rules, but once we started the game was over within 45 minutes.  Matt did an impressive job taking advantage of connections between provinces (I didn't even notice the connections over sea lanes!) and easily beat us.  A fun time and I'd like to try China now to see if that would be a good purchase option.

posted on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:01:51 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [3]
 Monday, January 15, 2007

Note: this is going to be a personal, lengthy, non-gaming related post.  Don't worry - I'm not going to turn this into a personal finance blog.  There are a number of things I just wanna say and this is my platform for saying it.

Some Ancient History

I was raised in a frugal household but we didn't talk much about money.  My parents stressed economy in a number of ways: minimizing the use of air conditioning and heating, not wasting money on sometimes inferior name-brand clothes, and not eating out.  While I don't remember conversations about saving, use of credit, we did often talk about the stock market and insurance (both parents were in the insurance business).  Heading off to college I had a decent idea of how to manage money, but these ideas were mostly from intuition and random observations and certainly not through any sort of programmed training (school, parents, or other sources).

My memories of my college years and finances mostly involve stress.  I went to a very expensive private university but had a full tuition scholarship from the US Air Force plus a grant from the engineering school that paid for some of my housing and book costs.  I didn't work during school - I didn't think it would be possible to manage getting 2 BS degrees plus fulfill my ROTC obligations while holding down a job.  The Air Force paid me $100 per month as a stipend which helped cover some basic expenses.

The stress came in regarding how I handled my finances in relation to my parents, and the mutual expectations we had in this area which were largely never discussed.  My (immature) thinking at the time was largely "hey, I got a free ride and my parents are almost completely off the hook for college.  They should gladly provide the free cash I need to live comfortably at school."  I'm sure my parents had a very different perspective.  My dad had gone through a number of job changes over the past 5 years (that's why I changed high schools 5 times) and I suspect finances were tighter then they had expected going into my college years.  The real issue here is that we never sat down and talked about expectations.  What sort of budget should I be living on?  How much should I expect to receive from my parents on a monthly basis?  Instead, we basically lived month to month for four years, with periodic phone calls from me asking for more money.  I hardly lived a flamboyant life during those years, but I certainly wasn't frugal either.  It also didn't help that the summer jobs I held only covered my living expenses and didn't allow me to put away money to carry me through the school year.  This was certainly a conscious choice on my part.

I think it was around my sophomore or junior year that I responded to my first credit card offer.  Even in the late 80s the credit card companies were all over college campuses.  I don't know if I got a free pizza or t-shirt with my card, but I didn't have any problems qualifying and so started my adult life in managing debt.  I lived month to month accumulating a small amount of debt, making monthly payments more than the minimum but less than the payoff.  I assumed that I would be able to clean it all up once I started my day job after college.

Towards the end of undergrad I decided that I would delay my active duty commitment and go to graduate school.  I was originally accepted into a USAF program that would pay for 1-2 years of graduate engineering work and did not expect to have to pay.  I was all set to go to Stanford when I got the word in March or April that the program was discontinued - if I wanted to delay I would instead have to pay my own way.  The good news is that I wouldn't incur any additional active duty commitment while on the educational delay.  I readjusted my sites for grad school on a less expensive institution, especially given the fact that it was too late to get any reasonable financial aid package.  I decided that UCSB was a great fit - affordable, a better program fit (I'd be studying computer and software architecture instead of signal processing), and a two year program that would be well paced for me.

This choice also led to some additional stress - once again, I never sat down with my parents to fully discuss the financial implications of this choice.  I was planning on having them fill in some financial gaps for me in order to attend school based on an indirect, non-specific conversation we had that spring.  That summer (1990) things came to a head when I realized that they were not going to be able to provide much assistance at all.  This led to some mutual frustration and a bit of scrambling on my part.  I decided to drive to California quite a bit earlier than originally planned to explore my options for financial aid, work, etc.  I think arrived in Santa Barbara around 3-4 weeks before the start of classes.

That decision paid off as I was able to make myself somewhat of a nuisance in the graduate engineering office.  I got things underway to work towards in-state tuition and let them know that I was very interested in any teaching or research assistantships (TA, RA) that are available.  I also managed to pull in a $7,500 student loan which would allow me to at least get through the first semester.  My persistence was noticed - a new grant came in for an RA position that an existing TA was going to fill.  That left an opening and I got the first call - I'd be teaching the undergraduate EE control systems lab.  This TA position also came with another benefit - they would grant me in-state tuition starting with the first semester.  This was HUGE for me, allowing me to get through 2 years of grad school without taking out any more than the $7,500 loan.  It didn't hurt that Julie and I married in May 1991 and I was able to lean on my new sugar-mommy.

This is all leading to some key points:

  • Julie and I entered into our marriage with some of my credit card debt (less than $2000, maybe less than $1000) plus my $7,500 student loan.
  • Julie brought no debt to our marriage.  In fact, if I recall, she brought a tidy some of money that was left over from her education fund.

Early Married Life

If I were to assign a grade to how we managed our finances in our early married life, I would give us a B+ or A-. 

We've purchased 4 cars in 15 years, all new, all financed.  The good news is we paid off every car we purchased within 18 months of the purchase.  We're going on 9 years for our Dodge Durango and 6 years for the Toyota RAV4, with no immediate plans to replace either.

We bought our first home in Boise when I left the USAF to work for Micron Technologies.  We bought our second home when we moved to Sherwood, Oregon in 1998.  We took advantage of a VA loan to get essentially a zero down mortgage for the Boise home, and built enough equity there to get a decent down payment for the Sherwood house.  Early on we started making additional principal payments on our home with the thought that it would be nice to have it free and clear sometime short of 30 years.

We've always managed to fully fund any tax-free or tax-deferred retirement options at our disposal.  Julie grew up with strong foundation of savings, mostly derived from mother-mandated reading of the Richest Man in Babylon, and we believe firmly in the pay-yourself-first mentality.  Company sponsored retirement plans are a great way to optimize this model.

Credit cards have always had a place in our household, though early on we committed to paying off balances each month and not carrying debt.  We were not always 100% compliant with this policy, sometimes going overboard and having to play catchup.  Every 3-4 years we would have a collective "oh shit" experience and regroup, look at our budget, and get things under control.  This moment was almost always inspired by a month when we couldn't cover the credit card balance.

Still, we felt that we were doing just fine and knew that we were handling our finances better than your average married couple in America.  We had a healthy fear of consumer debt and a decent nose for telling good debt from bad debt.  Here's a recap of our situation at this time:

  • Our only debt is our house
  • From time to time we overspend on the credit card and can't pay the full amount off at the end of the month
  • We are saving in company-sponsored retirement plans, plus a bit extra in Roth IRAs, but that's it

The Last 3 Years

I started listening to Dave Ramsey on a local radio station about 3-4 years ago.  He was a lot preachier then, even condescending at times, but his message resonated with me: stay out of debt and free up cash flow so that you can fund the things that are important to you.  "Live like no-one else, so that later you can live like no-one else."  I'm not to proud to admit that what I loved the most was the associated schadenfreude as I listened to all of the stories from those poor souls that were taking out payday loans to make their minimum credit card payments.  It didn't hurt that most of the callers have southern/rural accents, only adding to the sense of elitism one can feel living here in the enlightened Pacific northwest.  None of this stuff really applies to us, right?  We pay off our credit cards every month, don't have a car payment, and are well on our way to paying off our home.

In fact, we were likely vastly under-performing our potential in terms of savings, security, and future planning.  We had long ago abandoned any sort of budgeting process and really only discussed high ticket purchases.  If I wanted a new book, CD, DVD, or boardgame I would just buy it.  We had fallen into the trip of many supposedly affluent Americans - allowing our spending to grow exactly in proportion to income growth and failing to take advantage of opportunities to leverage that cash flow for even greater opportunities.

About 3 years ago we were fortunate enough to be able to take some Corillian stock earnings off the table.  While I had long ago lobbied against paying off the house too early (the math just doesn't make sense, does it?), Julie and I had a heart-to-heart and decided that we would use any extra cash available to pay off the house.  We managed to do so in early 2004 and it was an amazing life event for us.  Unfortunately, there were some mistakes in tax accounting and we ended up having to write a large check to the IRS in early 2005.  Where did they money come from?  You guessed it - a home equity line of credit.  So just like that, we were back into some house debt.

We also went in on a purchase of a beach house with Julie's mom and step-dad in the summer of 2004.  It was relatively easy to find the free cash flow to pay for the mortgage, especially considering that we had just finished paying off our primary residence (that was a big factor in the decision to participate in the purchase).

The home equity debt lingered until the fall of 2006.  Dave Ramsey showed up on my XM radio and I listened to him off and on throughout 2006, even adding his 1 hour podcast to my subscription list.  Sometime in September or October, I admitted to myself that I was just sick and tired of carrying the home equity debt.  I also admitted to myself that our spending was out of control - not going into debt out of control, but still out of control enough to potentially prevent us from reaching some long-term goals.  We needed a new plan and process to fix things up.  I decided that I would try Dave's Total Money Makeover "by the book".  Situation summary:

  • Mostly paid off house - some home equity debt lingering
  • Added a mortgage for the beach house
  • Still playing by the same credit card rules

A New Plan

Dave Ramsey likes to characterize married couples as "the geek and the free spirit".  Can you guess which one I am?  I started doing some serious number crunching and account analysis.  I started off just using Excel with some downloaded history data from my bank and credit card accounts.  My mission: find ways to free up cash flow.  Julie and I immediately set a few end-of-year goals:

  1. Get a $1000 emergency fund established
  2. Pay off the home equity loan
  3. Be well on our way to a fully funded $10,000+ emergency fund

Step 1 was easy, step 2 took some work.  We attacked the cash flow from a few different angles.  First, we dialed down any discretionary investing or extra payments.  This included reducing the monthly college savings for Jacob and Matthew from $1000 to $200.  We also agreed to stop making extra payments on the Salishan mortgage for a while.  Second, we agreed to get on a written budget, spending every dollar on paper before the month starts.  For the first month we did this in Excel using a downloaded template I found, but the geek in me took over and I went back to using a Personal Finance Manager (PFM).  Even though I'm a long-time Quicken fan, I decided to go with Microsoft Money this time around.  I'm sure I could have made this work with either tool, but I happened to have a free copy of Money sitting on my shelf (one of the benefits of working in the online finance business).

Side note: The budgeting tools have improved dramatically in PFMs.  My absolute favorite feature in Microsoft Money is the "reallocate..." option on budget categories.  There's nothing like a surprise in the middle of a month to throw off the best written plans, but I find that by using the reallocate feature I'm able to keep the bottom line balanced/fixed while staying on top of and reacting to surprises. I'm also using this feature to track Julie's and my slush fund for discretionary purchases without losing track of the real category that the purchase belongs to.  For example, I might start the month with a $50 boardgame budget, and a $100 slush fund for discretionary purchases.  If I spend $80 on boardgames, I reallocate $30 out of my slush fund into the boardgame category to balance the budget.

We were very realistic going into the budgeting process and didn't overdo it cost-cutting wise.  The process of writing everything down was enough to wake us up and start changing habits.  I also closed one credit card and we agreed to use our only remaining credit card for reimbursable business expenses.  Julie and I each got a First Tech debit Visa card and we started using those for all personal purchases.

I can't stress enough how important the move from credit card to debit card was.  While it isn't the same as spending green cash, using a debit card is much closer to that and when you see a bank account declining balance you feel the pain of spending much closer to purchasing event than you do with a credit card.

The end result for 2006 was that we easily met our goals and got our emergency fund up to around $6,000 by the end of the year. I also think it is having a measurable positive impact on our marriage relationship.  We are openly talking about money in a very healthy way.  We each have fairly big ticket cost items on the horizon we want to plan for, and we are doing just that: planning for them.  We are in the middle of a 3 year home remodeling project and are not going in debt to see it through conclusion.  Here's a summary of how we ended 2006:

  • Debt free except for the beach house
  • Almost a fully funded emergency fund
  • Living on a written budget
  • Poised to free up significant cashflow for savings

How We Live Today

We are still only starting this journey as we began the process with a number of projects in flight, mostly in the form of furniture purchases and other home decorating plans.  Projects like this follow a typical lifecycle: first you start measuring where you are, then you try to control the overall system to get it managed, then you start to optimize it to get the most efficiency from the moving parts.  We are just now transitioning into this optimizing stage.

What I also love about this process is that we've been very inclusive of Jacob and Matthew during the process.  They can't help but eavesdrop and hear us talking about finances, and we consciously chose to be upfront with them about what we're doing so that they won't get worried that we are in financial trouble.  Jacob read Total Money Makeover cover to cover and Matthew loves to say "better than I deserve".  The boys are on a pay-for-work commission plan and have their own savings goals.  I believe they are both developing a firm understanding of good vs. bad debt and have a healthy fear of credit cards.

Julie and I each have $100 in our monthly "slush fund", which is probably a bit too small.  I would rather zero out as much of the discretionary budget categories (books, music, movies, boardgames, etc.) and rely on allocations month-to-month from the slush accounts.  We're taking it in stages and I don't want to force drastic behavior changes.

We have yet to figure out what our target/desired monthly savings rate should be, and how we want to allocate those dollars.  Should dial back up the 529 plans for the kids?  I worry about overfunding those accounts - I'm thinking we should only fund up to the state tax deduction that we get.  I'm not sure the long-term tax savings are worth the lack of flexibility we will have compared to just hiding the money away in decent mutual funds.

What the Future Holds

The single biggest looming question that Julie and I will need to face is whether or not to accelerate payoff on the Salishan mortgage.  This is a joint decision with the in-laws so it can't (easily) be a unilateral choice on our part.  This sort of decision gets into a very controversial and often divisive area of personal finance - is it wise or stupid to pay off real-estate debt early, especially on property that is very likely to have significant appreciation during the life of the mortgage?

There's a related issue that Dave Ramsey often talks about regarding how to pay down non-mortgage debts.  Conventional wisdom says that you attack the highest interest debts first and work your way toward low interest debt.  Dave says this wisdom is flawed because of the lack of recognition of the psychological benefits of knocking off entire debts - getting those small wins that show progress.  That's why he says to order your debts smallest to largest and pay them off in that order.  Other than in extreme circumstances, the difference in interest paid will be very small (when compared to the other approach) and he asserts that people are much more likely to succeed when they get that initial progress kick.

This is related to the mortgage payoff question in that there's more to the answer than just a numbers analysis.  Again, conventional wisdom says that you should take the cashflow you would use to make extra mortgage payments and invest it - you'll get a better rate of return on those funds, especially when you discount the mortgage interest rate by your tax deduction.  It just isn't this simple - there are other factors at play here:

  • You need to risk-adjust any projected returns when you invest those funds.  There's no such thing as a guaranteed rate of return in the stock market.  If you want safe, guaranteed returns, it is unlikely you'll get a better return on your money than paying off the mortgage.  Still, in the long term, I doubt anyone will argue that over a 5+ year period the odds are pretty good you'll do better with a decent mutual fund.
  • The psychological benefits of owning your home free and clear.  It is very liberating!  It encourages free thinking and risk taking when you don't have that $1000 (or $800 or $2000 or whatever) monthly payment looming over you.
  • The discipline factor - let's face it, most people are not disciplined enough to stick to a surplus investing plan and are better off working towards a paid off home as they approach retirement age.

All that said, even if you detest what Dave Ramsey has to say about paying off mortgages (you know who you are!) it is hard not to agree with the key first steps in Dave's plan (this is from memory... Jacob can let me know if I got it right):

  1. Establish a $1000 emergency fund
  2. Get on a written budget
  3. Stack your debts (non-mortgage) smallest to largest and attack them in that order - this is the debt snowball.
  4. When you are done with the debt snowball, fully fund your emergency fund with 3-6 months of living expenses.
  5. Start investing 15% of your gross income into retirement savings
  6. Save for college for your kids
  7. Pay off the home mortgage

I don't think you'll go wrong if you "only" accomplish steps 1-6 and decide to keep the home mortgage around for a while longer.

posted on Monday, January 15, 2007 11:44:57 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [6]

While I focused primarily on my unplayed games burndown throughout 2006, I actually set 5 distinct goals back in January 2006.  Let's review how I did on each goal.

1. Attend at least one mid-week gaming session a month (besides my own). This is mostly a matter of putting it on my schedule and making it a priority. I’m lucky to attend every other month, mostly due to my travel schedule.

I estimate that I made about 9-10 mid-month gaming sessions.  I started tracking my games played during the second half of the year, but have to guestimate for the first half.  I'm making more of Mike's sessions (closer to home) but still have a hard time making it to Doug's and have never made a trip to Matt's.

 

2. Play through my current owned but un-played list. I’ll probably post this next week with some comments. I’m allowed to add new games that go right into my un-played list. Maybe I’ll get to those next year. I think I might put a big burn-down chart on my game-room wall to track my progress.

This one got the most attention last year, and you can read my final 2006 burndown report.  I got through all but 2 of my unplayed games.

 

3. Play significantly more casual, short games at home with the family. I’ve already had some good success with this in the past week, playing Lost Cities twice with Jacob and Blink with Matthew. We also squeezed in a three-player game of Wyatt Earp this evening. This is hard to measure (not a very SMART goal) but the intent will pay off.

True, this was hard to measure.  I don't think I did very well in this area, especially playing lighter games with Matthew.  What I have done is play a lot more heavy 2-player games with Jacob, which has been a real treat for both of us.  Games we played in the last year include Twilight Struggle, Command & Colors: Ancients, ASL Starter Kit #1, and Through the Ages.  Hardly casual, short fare.


4. Organize and run sessions at GameStorm. I did this two years ago but didn’t last year. Not sure what I’ll run – any suggestions? We will definitely run some prototype playtestings for Sunriver Games, but I’d like to run something unusual/unlikely. Perhaps Battlestations would be a good choice.

I did some prototype playtesting and helped run the 2-player game tournament.  I also managed to run a number of unscheduled casual games like Can't Stop, Byzantium, and Munchkin.  This year I may help run a Kniziathon.


5. Improve my critical writing skills, particularly when reviewing and evaluating games. This takes time (that I’m not sure I have), practice, and personal content review/editing. I’d like be able to decompose a game as well as Chris Farrell but be a little less of a curmudgeon.

Talk about unmeasurable!  I'll let you, the reader, judge this.  I do know that I have not fundamentally changed my writing process in that I don't spend any more time editing or reviewing when I post then I did in 2005.


I've done some 2007 goal setting, but none of those are really focused on gaming.  One of those is to finish 2007 with no unplayed games in my collection - should be easier this year given that I'm starting with only two!  Julie and I have also set some financial goals that will limit my game purchasing, which is just fine by me.  I suspect I'll be buying more wargames this year than euros, partly because I've already P500'd a number of games that will eventually show up on my doorstep.  I will post shortly on games that I'm most interested in seeing in 2007.

posted on Monday, January 15, 2007 2:54:46 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [1]
 Saturday, January 06, 2007

The game classes have been a good success, even resulting in the conversion of a few families to full-time game geeks.  Julie is running the Wednesday class for 3/4 graders, and I handle the Thursday class for 4/5 graders.

Game On Games

After each class we have the kids rate the games and we now have a ranking of the games the kids have played so far:

Not that any of the kids don't like these games - they are all rating very highly (Take it Easy is at a 3.6 on Chuck's 4 point scale).  Julie and I agree that the true test is what games the kids ask for on the periodic open gaming session where they get to pick and choose.  I think their choices align with the ratings above, though Walk the Dogs is probably a bit closer to 1st or 2nd place.  As we get towards the end of the year and start doing end-of-year open sessions I'll report back on their choices.

Here's what we have on tap for coming weeks:

posted on Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:52:54 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [1]

Jacob and I are starting to get a bit hooked on Command & Colors: Ancients.  We played a game Thursday night then brought it out again this afternoon.  It sure is nice to play a wargame multiple times in a row like this - I must remember that and try it more often.  Amazing how the rules stick that way.

On Thursday we played the Castulo, with Jacob playing the Romans and me the Carthaginians.  This is a break-out scenario where the Roman player is trying to escape off the Carthaginian side of the board.  It also involves a bit of terrain which was a first for me.  We did fumble with the rules a bit, especially the benefits leaders bring (they must be attached to give the morale boost on ignoring flags, but an adjacent leader can give the attack bonus).  This was a decent first scenario for Jacob as it doesn't involve the elephants; elephants aren't that complex, but for a simple game they probably do introduce the most variable complexity.  The game was very tight with Jacob threatening to run off two cavalry units to seal the victory,  but I was able to force back his cavalry with a well played attack and momentum advance attack.  Still, my position was too weak to survive as he subsequently won the required flags by eliminating a weak stray unit.

Today we tried out the Ilipa scenario, the same one I played with Eric Landes a few months back.  This brings elephants into the mix (or, as we prefer to say, Stampy) and is more of a wide open smack-down with a healthy mix of cavalry, medium, and heavy units.

CC Ancients

Things did not start at well for me, the Carthaginians.  Before I even played my first command card Jacob eliminated my elephant unit on the right flank.  Those pesky spear chuckers took him out with successive single-die red square rolls.  And I had so much planned for those two.  Sniff.

CC Ancients Elephants

This was the closest game of C&C I've played yet.  I surged ahead with six flags to Jacob's four - seven are needed for victory.  Jacob caught up with a well played behind-the-lines penetration, but he left a stray unit that I was able to take out with a ranged fire to win 7-6.

I also spent about 3 hours putting stickers on my blocks for the 1st expansion while watching the Colts game.  As I finished the Greek blocks and started on the Eastern Kingdom blocks, I realized I had used the wrong color of blocks for the Greeks.  Oops.  Too late to move stickers too - they are (thankfully) designed to stick tight.  So I checked the block count to see how much damage I had done.  I was fine with the infantry, leader/chariot, and elephant blocks, but there are quite a few more blocks for cavalry for the EK than for the Greeks.  I checked the scenarios to figure out what configuration would allow me to play the most, and assembled what I could muster out of the remaining blue blocks.  Not satisfied, I searched Julie's craft drawer and found some blue paint that is more than close enough to work then proceeded to paint 9 extra natural blocks to turn them into blue blocks.  This would not work for a Columbia-style block game as it would defeat fog of war, but for C&C this is not problem.  This could have been a much bigger disaster if the two sides weren't pretty balanced to start with.

posted on Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:14:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [0]
 Wednesday, January 03, 2007

If you follow this weblog (and the now defunct Gathering of Engineers blog) you know that I had a New Years resolution to play through my current owned but unplayed collection of games.  This lead to a tracking and execution model of burning down the list.  2006 is now behind me and I'll give myself a qualified success score on the project.  I finished the year with 2 unplayed games in my collection (minus games I've moved to my trade/sell list).

Some interesting statistics:

  • I started the year with 83 unplayed games in my collection
  • I peaked at 118 unplayed plus newly played in 2006 games in early November (post Essen).  This means I added about 35 games to my collection this year, not including games I purchased that I had already played.
  • I sold, traded, or gave away 30 games that were on my unplayed list at some time during the year.

In case you want to track my updates through the year, here's a summary:

Here's my final burndown chart.

Burndown20070103

Thanks to the help of a dedicated set of friends and family, I was able to close out the year by knocking 14 games off the list in less than 48 hours.  These weren't just little card games either - we played some meaty games like Imperial, Shogun, and El Caballero.  Here's a brief wrap-up of each game played with some commentary:

Der Dieb von Bagdad

The running commentary in my game group (at least with KC and Rita) is how good this game is and how bad the dice game is.  Color me random, but I think I like the dice game a bit more.  At least this game doesn't have a simultaneous selection mechanism to choose what room to go to - that would drop it down to a 2 or 3 rating for me.

Employee of the Month

It was hard to get past some of the graphical design / human factors issues with this game, but it was a decent diversion.

Fraud Squad

Basically Clue without a board, this one dragged on too long for us to finish.  There are simply too many permutations to track and everyone found it to be too much work and too little fun.  Plus, I don't get the inclusion of a roll-the-die-and-you-might-lose-a-turn mechanic.

El Caballero

I was tired, distracted, and not really paying attention to this game but I still managed to win.  That can't be a good thing, but I'll be willing to try this one again.

Shogun

One of the highlights of the weekend for me.  I love it and am now wondering if I should trade away my pasted-up Wallenstein copy.

Bosworth Chess

One of the surprises of the weekend for me, despite KC's frustration is the middle / 3rd player in what really should be a 2 OR 4 player game, not a 2-4 player game.  I think there's a fun little chess variant here and I look forward to trying it with my chess club.

Socks in the City

Not much to say here - this was in the category of "OK, let's get this out and be done with it".  Thanks KC for teaching and bearing with me on the play.  This will go to the trade/giveaway pile.

Master Labyrinth

I found this in shrink at a Goodwill and it will be a nice donation to the school.  I don't see any reason to keep this if you already own Amazing Labyrinth, which I do like.

Hero Clix

I somehow talked Julie into playing this with me, and we both came away with the same impression.  Boring, tedious to lookup the abilities in external charts, and mostly just a stand around and attack game.

Starship Catan

Ken and I played this on Sunday morning and we both loved the experience.  It played in under 2 hours and we think we could get it down to an hour now that we understand the game.  I expect to see this come out quite a bit once Jacob and I give it another try.  Julie might enjoy it too.

Big Kini

I did not expect to like this game but came away very satisfied.  It looks and feels similar to Tongiaki but it is heavier with less randomness/chaos and some interesting mechanics.  It did tend to regress into min-maxing at the end which dragged out the final stage of the game.

Imperial

20061231 049

I was able to sit out for an hour of this 2:15 length game because I lost control of the UK to my own son Jacob.  I still managed to beat Ken and KC (hah!) but Brandon and Jacob ruled the day and finished 1-2.  I'll likely be writing more about this well designed war/economic game hybrid.

New York Central

It took a while for me to get this game going - the rules are a bit convoluted and I need to write some play tips on the geek to help others.  Still, this is a decent stock / train game played with cards that I'm going to keep and bring out some more this year.  We played in about 35 minutes.  The main question we have is how controllable the game is with bad card draws.

Crazy Diamond - Karatino

We played the shorter Karatino game... what a dog.  I suppose I'll try the Crazy Diamond game before letting this one loose, but I don't have high hopes.

Unplayed Games

Wooden Shoes and Iron Monsters

This was just too long and too complicated to consider bringing out over the weekend.  I really don't know what to expect with this game but given my groups fondness for 18xx games of late, maybe it won't be too hard to get it out.

Das Sceptor von Zavandor

We skipped this primarily because I don't have the English pasteups yet for the cards - just a reference guide.

Games Moved to the Trade Pile

History of the World

Britannia

These are both "old" versions of the games, and I just don't think they'll get out enough in my group or family.

Hellas (German version)

I didn't know how language dependent this game was when I picked it up on sale during a trip through Germany last year.

Cannes - Stars, Scripts and Screens

This was an add-on to my Indonesia purchase at Essen 2005, and I should have skipped it.

Final Thoughts

This process had the desired effect - refocusing my attention on my collection for playability and not just for collecting.  I'm committed to keeping the number of games in my collection approximately flat and I'd like to finish each year with as close to zero unplayed games as possible.  The end result is going to mean fewer purchased games in 2007 and focusing on playing the ones I have.

posted on Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:18:26 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Comments [2]